South Africa has been thrown into fresh political drama as President Cyril Ramaphosa’s judicial commission kicked off public hearings into claims that top politicians are in bed with criminal gangs. The scandal, already shaking the country’s battered justice system, is being closely watched both at home and abroad.
The three-member panel, chaired by a former Constitutional Court judge, began sitting in Pretoria on Wednesday after weeks of delay. It follows bombshell allegations by provincial police chief, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, who accused senior officials – including suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu – of blocking investigations into political killings and other serious crimes.
Mkhwanazi, a veteran officer with over three decades of service, was the first to take the stand. His testimony painted a grim picture, warning that South Africa’s criminal justice system is under “continuous threat and sabotage” and risks “total collapse if nothing is done.” His words underscored how deeply organised crime has infiltrated state institutions.
He alleged under oath that Mchunu took payments from businessman Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala, currently facing murder and money laundering charges. He also claimed the minister dismantled a task force investigating political assassinations to shield powerful allies. A Pretoria court has since denied Matlala bail.
Mchunu, once considered a possible successor to Ramaphosa, has dismissed the allegations and is expected to testify before the panel in the coming weeks. His suspension in July by the president came shortly after Mkhwanazi went public with his claims.
But while the commission is seen as a bold step, critics worry about its teeth. Its recommendations are non-binding, meaning only Ramaphosa can decide whether to act. An interim report is due in three months, with the final report expected later.
For now, the hearings have opened a new chapter in South Africa’s long battle with corruption and crime. Whether this inquiry can restore public faith in law enforcement—or end up as another political show—remains the big question.
