Niger State Governor Mohammed Umaru Bago has sparked a national conversation after openly admitting that the pursuit of a second term often prevents leaders from taking bold decisions necessary for development. Speaking at an official ceremony, he acknowledged that certain reforms and disciplinary actions were avoided out of concern that they might affect his chances of re-election in 2027.
According to him, excessive politicization of governance and the fear of offending influential stakeholders discourage decisive leadership in the public interest. He therefore advocated for a single tenure for governors, arguing that such a system would allow leaders to focus entirely on governance without electoral pressure.
His remarks have revived an old constitutional reform debate previously raised during the 2014 National Conference. Several political figures, legal experts, and civil society voices have supported the idea of a single five- or six-year term, suggesting it could reduce corruption linked to re-election campaigns and promote more courageous, results-driven governance.
However, others have warned of potential risks. Critics argue that a non-renewable term could encourage impunity, personal enrichment, or reduced accountability, especially in a system where oversight institutions remain weak. They stress that the real solution lies in strengthening institutions, transparency, and leadership accountability rather than tenure length alone.
