South Africa Approves Landmark Land Seizure Law

SOUTH African President Cyril Ramaphosa has signed into law a contentious bill enabling land expropriation without compensation under specific conditions. The move, reported by the BBC, has sparked fierce debate within the country, with opposition parties and some government coalition members voicing strong resistance.

The law, hailed by the ruling African National Congress (ANC) as a ‘historic milestone,’ aims to address the deep inequities in land ownership rooted in the apartheid era. Despite the end of apartheid more than 30 years ago, the majority of South African farmland remains under the control of the white minority, leaving black South Africans frustrated over the slow pace of reform.

A step towards transformation or controversy?

The law replaces the Expropriation Act of 1975, which required the state to compensate landowners under the ‘willing seller, willing buyer’ principle. According to the government, the new law allows expropriation without compensation in cases where it is deemed ‘just and equitable and in the public interest.’

Examples include unused or neglected land, land posing risks to the public, or property without any intent for development. Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya clarified that the law prohibits arbitrary seizures and mandates good-faith negotiations between the state and landowners before expropriation.

‘This legislation lays the foundation for equitable land reform while adhering to the constitutional principles of justice,’ said Magwenya.

Opposition and legal challenges

However, the Democratic Alliance (DA), South Africa’s second-largest party, has vowed to challenge the law in court. The DA supports land restitution initiatives but has criticised the parliamentary process that led to the bill’s approval.

The Freedom Front Plus, a party advocating for white minority rights, has also opposed the law, warning that it threatens private property rights and could set a dangerous precedent.

Radical opposition party Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) dismissed the law as a ‘compromise,’ arguing it falls short of addressing the urgent need for land redistribution.

Long road to reform

The new law follows a five-year public consultation process and reflects recommendations from a presidential advisory panel. However, its implementation is expected to remain contentious as South Africa grapples with balancing restitution and economic stability.

With stark divisions over the law’s impact on land ownership and economic development, the issue of land reform continues to be a deeply polarising topic in South Africa’s political landscape.