A Tanzanian court has overturned a controversial decision that barred opposition politician Luhaga Mpina from running in next month’s presidential election. Mpina, the flagbearer of the Alliance for Change and Transparency (ACT Wazalendo), had earlier been disqualified by the National Electoral Commission in August, which argued that he “lacked qualifications.” The move drew sharp criticism from his party and raised questions about the independence of the commission.
On Thursday, the presiding judge ruled that the electoral body had denied Mpina the right to be heard, describing the ban as unconstitutional, null, and void. With the ruling, Mpina is now cleared to participate in the October 29 poll, a development his supporters hail as a win for democracy and accountability.
The decision comes at a time of rising political tension. President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s administration has been under fire from human rights groups and election monitors, who accuse the government of cracking down on opposition voices and shrinking civic space as the elections draw near.
For ACT Wazalendo, the ruling signals more than just a legal victory—it underscores the need for credible oversight in Tanzania’s electoral system. Party officials argue that only fair competition can safeguard the country’s democratic future.
Meanwhile, the pressure on opposition figures is far from over. Tundu Lissu, leader of the main opposition party Chadema, is currently facing a treason trial that could carry the death penalty. He insists the charges are politically motivated to derail his presidential challenge against Hassan.
International observers are watching closely, urging Tanzanian authorities to respect constitutional rights and ensure free competition. With campaigning heating up, the reinstatement of Mpina is not just about one candidate—it’s a test of whether the judiciary can hold its ground in a politically charged season.
