IN a world where opinions are plentiful and facts are scarce, it is tempting to assume the role of judge, jury, and executioner. However, when it comes to cases that are ongoing in Courts, it is essential to exercise restraint and let the judiciary do its job.
In all my years in the writing profession, I have learned the importance of avoiding commentary on sub-judice matters. Even some lawyers, well-versed in the intricacies of the law, recognize the need to refrain from public opinionating on pending cases. To assume that one knows better than the judges is not only presumptuous but also reckless and irresponsible.
The Abuja status ruling by the Supreme Court in Obi vs Tinubu. serves as a strong reminder of the dangers of speculation and armchair judging. Prior to the verdict, public opinion, driven by partisanship, was largely unanimous in its misinformed belief that Abuja was a state. This highlights the importance of allowing the courts to deliberate and decide, unfettered by external influences and partisan commentary.
By keeping our opinions in check and letting the courts do their work, we can ensure that justice is served, and the rule of law is upheld. It’s time to recognize the complexity of the law and the expertise of those who interpret it. Let us adopt a more responsible approach, one that balances our right to free speech with the need to respect the judicial process.
