AS a journalist and a politician, I have the privilege of engaging with the diverse opinions and views of Nigerians about the judiciary and our legal process. A common theme that resonates across these discussions is a deep-seated mistrust of the judiciary, particularly under the current administration of President Tinubu. Many Nigerians openly question the integrity of the judiciary, and a sentiment that I frequently encounter is: “Why would Asue Ighodalo waste his time and resources pursuing his case at the tribunal when it is obvious he won’t get justice under this APC-led government?”
This shared doubt about the judiciary’s fairness is both troubling and thought-provoking. Growing up, we were taught that the judiciary was the last hope of the common man. It wasn’t just a saying—it was a belief firmly rooted in the justice system’s perceived impartiality and integrity. Courts were seen as sanctuaries for truth and equity, where even the most marginalized could find solace and justice. Today, that belief has been significantly eroded, and one must ask: at what point did Nigerians lose confidence in the judiciary? And how did the judiciary itself allow its credibility to deteriorate to this extent?
However, if we critically analyze recent trends in judicial pronouncements, it is clear that not all judgments have been controversial or politically influenced. There have been instances where the courts adhered strictly to the rule of law, particularly in some recent appeal court rulings. These judgments demonstrated fairness, legal precision, and a commitment to justice, proving that the judiciary still has the capacity to deliver credible outcomes when it chooses to.
This gives me hope. Despite the widespread skepticism, I remain optimistic that all hope is not lost for our legal system. I firmly believe that the judiciary can seize this moment to redeem itself, beginning with the Edo State tribunal. A just and transparent ruling in this case would not only reaffirm the judiciary’s independence but also serve as a critical step towards rebuilding public trust. Such a ruling would signal to Nigerians that the courts remain a viable avenue for justice, even in the face of political pressures.
But restoring faith in the judiciary is only part of the solution. Nigeria’s democratic process depends on the integrity of all its institutions, particularly the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Like the judiciary, INEC has faced significant public criticism for its perceived failures, especially in recent elections. To truly strengthen our democracy, INEC must embrace transparency, accountability, and a renewed commitment to delivering credible elections. The same reformative spirit must also extend to other sectors critical to governance.
While the judiciary’s reputation has been tarnished, it is not beyond redemption. A fair and just outcome at the Edo State tribunal could mark the beginning of a broader reform and serve as a beacon of hope for Nigerians who have grown disillusioned. It is time for our institutions to rise to the occasion and restore the faith of the people. Only then can we move towards a society where justice, fairness, and equity are not just ideals, but realities for all.
Rita Ebiuwa
